|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sex offenders group home offends neighbors LEE PERLMAN THE MID-COUNTY MEMO
A neighbor couple took their three-year-old for a walk on Northeast 102nd Avenue. As they passed by Number 330, their three-year-old wandered into the driveway. A group of adults materialized and put up a human wall to block the childs progress. One woman explained that the house contained a group of men, some of who were pedophiles and recovering sex offenders. 330 N.E. 102nd Ave. abuts Kerchals back yard, separated by a broken-down fence. Kerchal contacted the owner, chiropractor Dr. Larry Berntsen. He told her he had rented the house to Development Systems, Inc., a care provider, on a long-term lease. Only later did he become aware of the population who would be using the facility, he said. He feels kind of stuck, Kerchal said. If he were to try to break the lease, he could be sued. Kerchal felt the location was an inappropriate place for such a facility, given the large number of children who live in proximity to it. She expressed her fears to Donald Acker, director of DSI. His answer, she said, was, Im sorry you dont want us here, but this is a good facility for us, and its completely legal. The companys clients receive training there, and they are escorted to and from the facility. Acker offered to repair the fence that separates his property from Kerchals. He also said that there are other sex offenders living in the neighborhood that neighbors dont know about. Acker told the Memo the system deals with developmentally disabled adults. Some are under court supervision, but none have been convicted of crimes. They are under supervision at all times while visiting the 102nd Avenue facility. Acker said he was not aware of being in violation of any city code requirements, but if they were they could bring themselves into compliance easily. Eric King of the Portland Office of Neighborhood Involvement, who has dealt with policy issues relating to social service facilities in neighborhoods, told the Memo that he was not aware that there was a treatment facility at this address. If the agencys clients lived there, he said, it would be a group living situation for which they would need a conditional use. However, DSI has every right to operate a training facility at this location. A representative of the City Bureau of Development Services confirmed this, but also said there may be an irregularity in other ways. To change from the residence it once was to institutional use would require a Change of Use process, and there is some doubt that DSI has gone through this. Another issue is that the property is zoned CM, a relatively seldom-used designation. By rights, commercial uses are allowed in under this designation, but at least 50 percent of the space must be devoted to residential use. A representative of DSI contacted by the Memo claimed that this requirement is met because the house has a kitchen and bathroom, even though no one lives there. Meanwhile, Kerchal is not at all comfortable with the situation. When the men come into their backyard, I dont feel comfortable being in mine, she told the Memo. I can see from my back window into their house, which means they can see into mine. I feel encroached upon. Im concerned that one of these men may look across the way and see my cute little ten-year-old son. Yes, Im told theyre under supervision at all times, but what if they were to come back some day when theyre not under supervision? (Acker said this is statistically very unlikely.) If I moved out and tried to sell or rent this house, Id have to disclose whats next to it, and that would affect me financially. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MEMO Advertising | MEMO Archives | MEMO Web Neighbors | MEMO Staff | Home |